2008/1/16, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 06:39 PM 1/16/2008 +0100, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote: > >2008/1/16, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > At 03:48 PM 1/16/2008 +0100, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote: > > > > > > Unfortunately the distutils.archive_util module was written before > > > > > > tarfile was available. > > > > > > > >Are there chances to see this implemented? > > > > > > Are you volunteering? :) If so, then perhaps you can get a patch in > > > for Python 2.6. > > > >Uhm... why not? :-) > >If someone could give me some pointers on nailing down the issue I > >could give it a try (note: never seen distutils internals before). > > See the distutils.archive_util module - the disutils uses that for > all its archive creation. > > > >My only concern is that it's not rare that patches provided by users > >are often ignored and they remains stagnant on the Python bug tracker. > >I just wouldn't spend time on that for nothing. > > Well, I can review the patch and commit it, if I like it. :)
Ok. I should find some time for trying to work on this this week. I'll keep you updated. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
