I provided a patch for both issues which are now reported on the bug tracker: http://bugs.python.org/issue1885 http://bugs.python.org/issue1886
2008/1/20, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 09:21 PM 1/19/2008 +0100, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote: > >As I suspected there's a bug in the current distutils code. > >Steps to reproduce the problem: > > > >1: Run "python setup.py sdist --formats=gztar,tar". > >2. dist directory now contains "module.gztar" and "module.tar" files > >as expected. > >3: Run "python setup.py sdist --formats=tar,gztar". > >4. dist directory now contains only "module.gztar" file because > >"module.tar" has been overwritten when archive_util.make_tarball() > >function was called for the second time. > > > >I'll try to fix this while I'm working on the other issue. > > Well, using the integrated compression in the tarfile module would > certainly fix it for the case where tarfile is being used. :) It > actually seems like a good argument for having tarfile as the primary > generation method, with spawning as the backup. > > _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
