> The other argument for using spawn() first would be that it's the > least invasive and most backward-compatible change.
Yeah, I agree. It would be probably better using spawn() as default. 2008/1/19, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > At 08:10 PM 1/19/2008 +0100, Giampaolo Rodola' wrote: > >Just another thing. > >I was wondering what do you think would be better to do as default. > >Using Python modules as default and spawn() as fall back or doing > >the contrary? > >Maybe using spawn() as default would be better since original > >utilities should be faster than python modules. > > I suppose that's a possibility, although the tarfile module doing the > compression might be faster than separate tar and compress steps. > > The other argument for using spawn() first would be that it's the > least invasive and most backward-compatible change. > > _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
