On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:53:11PM +0100, Tarek Ziadé wrote: > As I expected, we didn't find a full consensus on the final PEP 386 > schema on Distutils-SIG. But the one presented is > good enough for what we need to express, as far as I am concerned (and > some other people). > > This status understandable, and can go on for months in distutils-SIG.
Your brain might have thought of more then your fingers wrote here... Not sure what that's supposed to mean but the last sentence doesn't look complete to me. Otherwise I agree with the content Cheers for the work Floris -- Debian GNU/Linux -- The Power of Freedom www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
