On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/12/7 Tarek Ziadé <[email protected]>: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Floris Bruynooghe >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:53:11PM +0100, Tarek Ziadé wrote: >>>> As I expected, we didn't find a full consensus on the final PEP 386 >>>> schema on Distutils-SIG. But the one presented is >>>> good enough for what we need to express, as far as I am concerned (and >>>> some other people). >>>> >>>> This status understandable, and can go on for months in distutils-SIG. >>> >>> Your brain might have thought of more then your fingers wrote >>> here... Not sure what that's supposed to mean but the last sentence >>> doesn't look complete to me. >> >> I'll need some help then on this one, must be my frenglish at work. > > "I believe that the current situation is as close to consensus as we > will get on distutils-sig, and in the interests of avoiding months of > further discussion which won't take things any further, I propose to > allow final comments from python-dev and then look for a final > decision". > > How does that sound?
Much better, in my opinion. Darren _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
