2009/12/8 Darren Dale <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2009/12/7 Tarek Ziadé <[email protected]>: >>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Floris Bruynooghe >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:53:11PM +0100, Tarek Ziadé wrote: >>>>> As I expected, we didn't find a full consensus on the final PEP 386 >>>>> schema on Distutils-SIG. But the one presented is >>>>> good enough for what we need to express, as far as I am concerned (and >>>>> some other people). >>>>> >>>>> This status understandable, and can go on for months in distutils-SIG. >>>> >>>> Your brain might have thought of more then your fingers wrote >>>> here... Not sure what that's supposed to mean but the last sentence >>>> doesn't look complete to me. >>> >>> I'll need some help then on this one, must be my frenglish at work. >> >> "I believe that the current situation is as close to consensus as we >> will get on distutils-sig, and in the interests of avoiding months of >> further discussion which won't take things any further, I propose to >> allow final comments from python-dev and then look for a final >> decision". >> >> How does that sound? > > Much better, in my opinion. >
Thanks Paul ! I'll send it sometimes today Regards Tarek _______________________________________________ Distutils-SIG maillist - [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/distutils-sig
