BTW, there are problems with any XHTML solution, which uses any JavaScript. A lot of stuff should be done differently. Given all uproar with W3C vs. WHATWG, and the current state of XHTML affairs, I would not mess with XHTML just yet. Let's see how it will turn out.
Thanks, Eugene "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 12/10/05, Robert Wittams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dojo seems to rely on adding its own unnamespaced attributes to normal > elements. Is this compatible with strict use of XHTML? No, it's not; this would result in a yellow screen of death if a page were served as application/xhtml+xml. Also in that case, it's necessary to use a different set of DOM methods (e.g., createElementNS() with a namespace argument instead of createElement()). It's a huge compatibility nightmare, really. -- "May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house." -- George Carlin
