On Jul 14, 2006, at 12:13 AM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 7/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> It makes coverage reports? And they work with Django? Whow! >> >> Sure. > > > Now - that's what I call a convincing reason to switch. Indeed :) > I'm still hesitant to make the _default_ testing scheme dependent > on an > external package, simply because Django doesn't have any > dependencies on > anything other than the Python core libraries and a DB integration > library. I completely agree -- having a testing framework that depends on an external package being installed is almost as bad as not having one at all. Batteries included, and all that... Now, what's the license of nose? Perhaps we could bundle it with Django (as we've done with PyDispatcher and Simplejson)? In my (limited) messing with Django & nose I've been pretty happy so far (but I've not played with Russell's patch for comparison). Jacob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
