On 7/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Tom Tobin wrote: > > On 7/27/06, Joe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In line with other sentiments I've expressed here in the past: IMHO, > > this means your *project manager* is addled, not Django's release > > process. If you can understand that the development version is stable > > enough to use, but your project manager can't, your project manager > > doesn't deserve his title. :p > > You are criticising a project manager that isn't confortable using a > development svn branch in a production envirment. > > > WOW. > > > You are a moron! > > > > First, the django developers are quite egotistical if they are claiming > that there nightly .95 build is stable, when at any time they could > introduce a bug. The whole point of a release is to do proper testing > and you can say "yes, we froze the code and did tons of testing so we > feel it is stable". > NOT "yeah i hack it everynight and I'm so awsome i never write a > single bug (and my poop doesn't stink -- James Bennett)". > > I thought the whole point of .95 was to get the framework where there > wouldn't be any backward incompatabilitys example(meta.blah vs > model.blah), not a feature race.
Between this and your prior message on this thread, I have cause to congratulate you: you are the first poster on either Django list to make it into my killfile. Considering that your immature behavior is highly unusual among community participants, I suspect you may be the last for quite some time. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
