James Bennett wrote: > On 10/26/06, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are there goals or docs about what this might become? There seem to be >> enough people using the comments systems that maybe people could work >> on a patch (or at least get started in the right direction) if there >> were some goals and ideas on what's considered broken currently. > > IIRC, one of the big (and, to me, most interesting) suggestions > involved changing the system so that you could write a model which > conformed to a particular interface (e.g., FK to user, FK to > contenttype and an object_id, plus maybe a couple methods), then drop > it into a setting and have it be "the comment model". The ones we ship > now should still be bundled, of course, and used as the defaults, but > that would add a huge amount of flexibility to the system.
I'm having trouble visualizing how that would work. I searched the list and the tickets for more info but didn't find anything. Is the gist of the idea that you'd set up the model and a few methods and the bulk of the work would get wrapped around that? Thanks, Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
