On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 11:09 +0200, Michael Radziej wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 14:02 +0200, Tomas Kopecek wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I think that blocktrans in its current state is more obstacle than
> > > helper for me and introduces lot of quite unnecessary code. Furthermore
> > > I see priority in usability and simplicity for designers than for
> > > translators.
> >
> > Well right there is one of the problems. Translators are first class
> > citizens as well. Whilst translator preferences don't have overriding
> > priority, they are important, so we strive to create something that
> > works nicely for everybody. That's why this is hard.
> >
> > Definitely keep coming up with ideas; it's the only way we'll find a
> > good solution. But you have to keep the people doing localisation in
> > mind as well as the people doing internationalisation.
>
> BTW, is there any solution to do template *tags* (not filters) inside
> blocktrans?
Not yet. There was a recent thread about this with no clear resolution.
Something like making {% with %} work in block scope might help there.
Having a solution to using {% with %} with template tags would solve
this and a couple of other things, I suspect. The recent thread was
actually about the "with" tag.
Malcolm
--
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory.
http://www.pointy-stick.com/blog/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
