On 11/30/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > > We're currently leaning more towards Joseph Kocherhans' replacement for > form_for_* (not sure how backwards compatible it will end up) and whilst > "nice to have", I don't see this as show stopper stuff for 1.0. > > Except I've gotten the impression that these form_for_* changes would be very helpful in getting some of the newforms-admin loose ends tied up (edit-inline in particular, I believe). Thus since the basic idea has gotten a positive response and there is already an initial implementation, I wouldn't be surprised to see the form_for_* changes become a pre-req to getting newforms-admin finished, which would turn them into a show-stopper for 1.0. This is just my impression, though, Joseph might very well have a different view.
On the issue of what to call 1.0, I like Max Battcher's idea of adopting an Ubuntu-like date-based version. Puts some useful information (how old is it?) into the release name and avoids preconceived notions of stability/completeness associated with .0 releases. Karen --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
