Is this set for 2009? ;) About subclassing, what was agreed upon? I'm going to rip my hair out if it does OneToOne relations and strange db queries :P
I think the major features listed here are good -- qsrf is the biggest one I want in.. come on .98? :) On Nov 30, 9:49 am, "Bryan L. Fordham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On the issue of what to call 1.0, I like Max Battcher's idea of > > adopting an Ubuntu-like date-based version. Puts some useful > > information (how old is it?) into the release name and avoids > > preconceived notions of stability/completeness associated with .0 > > releases. > > I'm +1 on that as well. Seriously, how many of us have been running > these pre-1.0 versions in production with no real problems? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
