On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Gary Wilson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Joseph Kocherhans wrote: > > I just uploaded a patch [1] for class based generic views that use > > ModelForm internally. Personally, I think this makes the generic views > > a lot more flexible, and gives us a great argument against > > adding-yet-another-config-argument-to-generic-views (even though I > > haven't heard that particular demand come up for awhile.) Just > > subclass the generic view, and do what you need. > > I like the flexibility that the class-based approach brings. I think a > similar idea could be used to clean up the duplication happening in the date > based generic views. Anyone know if that has been attempted?
Not to my knowledge, but if someone else doesn't try it first, I'm going to eventually. ;-) That goes for the list_detail ones as well. Joseph --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
