On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 5:53 AM, mrts <mrts.py...@gmail.com> wrote: > What if we try to be nice to ourselves and get #8138 and something in > the lines of http://oebfare.com/blog/2008/mar/25/faster-django-test-suite/ > into trunk ASAP, especially now that the dynamic workflow is really > gaining ground (both aggregates and model-validation is managed this > way)?
I am all for a faster test suite and #8138 is going to give us a nice speed boost, but my test runner is not ultimately a great way to go at this point. It would require the processing library thus making it really only viable for those running Python 2.6+. While it can be made optional, that is what it is now. I am all for its inclusion, but lets wait until it becomes, first, more stable (used by more people than me), and two, more people can actually take advantage of it out of the box. -- Brian Rosner http://oebfare.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
