On 1 Dub, 04:15, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <jacob.kaplanm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Russell Keith-Magee > AFAIK the two choices for doing browser tests are Selenium and > Windmill. Windmill has (as of today) direct Django integration, and > the developers are keen to help us get whatever we need out of > Windmill. Selenium doesn't, and I don't know what the developer's > priorities are. I don't see that it's that hard a choice given the > alternatives.
If Kevin is planning to use nose, I've put up together a nose plugin that can integrate selenium into tests. I'd be glad if they can be added/integrated/used/whatever; see them at http://devel.almad.net/trac/django-sane-testing/browser/djangosanetesting/noseplugins.py Your consert in Selenium Plugin. BTW, main problem with both Windmill and mine integration is kind of hacky way to put live server up (and, they're also conflicting with each other). Any solution to that (like, integrating into django core) would be just great (althrough I don't know if accepted, see http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2879 ). > Jacob Almad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
