On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Ben Firshman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 24 Apr 2009, at 16:21, zellyn wrote: > > > > > [I wasn't sure whether to post this before or after 1.1 dropped, but > > decided to post now, since I'm just looking for discussion and > > comments.] > > > > Django's contrib.syndication app feels different from normal views, > > using a dictionary and dispatching by slug, then finding objects by > > splitting the rest of the URL into "bits". > > > > It takes surprisingly few changes to make Feeds respond as normal > > views: define the __call__ method on Feed objects. > > > > Here are the changes required (using pastry.se for its diffing > > capability): http://pastry.se/46009/#e46010 > > And here's the output of `svn diff`: http://pastry.se/46016/ > > > > Thoughts, comments, suggestions? > > Funny you mention it, I've been working on something identical over > the past few days. It definitely makes sense. > > http://github.com/bfirsh/syndication-view/tree/master > > I took the backwards incompatible approach, with the intention of > writing a separate Feed class that hacked in the old methods for > backwards compatibility. > > Ben > > > > I like this proposal, however now is a bad time to bring this up. We are in the final stages of the 1.1 releaese, so we aren't in a position to be considering new features or API changes, can you please bring this up again at the feature selection stage for 1.2? Alex -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." --Voltaire "The people's good is the highest law."--Cicero --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
