On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Ben Firshman<[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 3 Aug 2009, at 14:50, Alex Gaynor wrote: >> >> Ben Firshman has written similar code that is backwards compatible >> with the current implementation: >> http://github.com/bfirsh/syndication-view/tree/master >> >> Alex > > I started going through all the syndication tickets and fixing them > too, notably making Atom support complete. Now 1.2 is underway I'll > finish it off. > > Does anybody have any opinions on the current way of using methods on > the Feed object (title(), link(), description() etc) to build the > feed? For me, it has proved inflexible and a little messy, but I can't > think of a better solution.
Can you elaborate on the inflexibilities you have seen? When I've hit problems with Feeds, it's been mostly due to the 'bits' parsing - the individual feed elements have fallen out reasonably easily. Yours, Russ Magee %-) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
