Hey Idan -- On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Idan Gazit<i...@pixane.com> wrote: > I've been working on prettyfication of the DDT. Github: > http://github.com/idangazit/django-debug-toolbar/tree/idan-ui-rf. It's > a reasonably complete reskinning of the existing DDT. There are still > a couple of outstanding issues but the redesign is largely finished.
Looks nice enough to me! > I didn't use the admin color palette because A) it's fugly and B) I > think making the DDT consistent with an optional-and-completely- > separate-contrib-tool is synthetic and meaningless. I'd disagree with (a), but, well, taste has no taste. However, I completely agree with (b) -- in fact, there's precedent for making developer-facing UI different: see the pretty error pages and the "it worked!" page, which aren't Django branded in any way. The reasoning was that we wanted the error pages to be somewhat framework-agnostic; we didn't want to impose our branding onto parts of *your* site. I'd say a similar ethos should be expressed in the debug toolbar branding. If you wanted to be extra special, some UI similarity between the error pages and the debug toolbar would probably be a good idea. Jacob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
