On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Russell Keith-Magee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:41 AM, Brett Hoerner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I would think read-slaves would be a pretty common application of >> multidb, but I can only speak to our use case. I know it's a bit late >> in the game, but we'll have to work up our own local fix or go with a >> proper one before we can deploy 1.2. And to think I was so happy >> about how many local Django patches I was able to remove going from >> 1.0->1.2. ;) > > You're right - read slaves are an intended common use case, and the > cross-database checks will get in the way for that case.
Hi Brett, FYI - I've just uploaded a patch to #12540 that implements something similar to what you proposed, along with a few other fixes. I'd be interested in hearing any feedback you may have. Yours, Russ Magee %-)
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
