----- Original Message ----
> From: Guido van Rossum <[email protected]>
> To: Jesse Noller <[email protected]>
> Cc: Vinay Sajip <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> >> Assuming PEP 391 gets the nod, then after implementing the changes into
> Python, I plan to work with the Django community to get improved logging
> support
> in Django for 1.3.
>
> Having read the PEP I heartily approve. The PEP can be moved to
> Accepted state. This can be implemented in Python 2.7 and 3.2, right?
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
Guido,
That's great - thanks very much! I'll get on with integrating the PEP 391
implementation into trunk right away, and it should be in good time for 2.7/3.2.
Regards,
Vinay
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
