On 8/4/2010 10:57 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Byron<bjr...@gmail.com>  wrote:
Updated the patch http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/13795

* Have you considered supporting "versioning" of keys to help with cache
   invalidation? Eric Florenzano has been doing some interesting
   experimenting along those lines in django-newcache
   (http://github.com/ericflo/django-newcache); you may want to look at the
   code and/or talk to him about working some of his ideas back into your
   key prefix proposal. At the very least, any changes we make to the
   caching backend should allow the sorts of things he's doing to keep
   working; ideally we should make those sorts of changes really easy to
   make.

Couldn't versioning be handled by setting CACHE_KEY_PREFIX to include some varying data like the svn revision? We've got a cache key prefix hacked into our work environment, and I ensure my dev machine never gets stale cache data like this:

   import time
   CACHE_KEY_PREFIX = "dev-ned-%s" % time.time()

This uses the start time of the dev server as part of the cache key so each invocation gets fresh data. In production, you'd use something different, but this illustrates the point. Or is there some more elaborate versioning being considered here?

--Ned.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django 
developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-develop...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to