On 25 February 2011 13:38, mmcnickle <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 25, 3:17 am, Gabriel Hurley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>    - May intimidate new contributors to see that their ticket was "closed".
>>    - Doesn't discount the fact that there may be a valid issue here which we
>>    don't want to forget about.
>
> I wouldn't underestimate either of these 2 points. The PHP core team
> "close" issues that need replies/more info, or simply haven't gained
> any attention after a month. Coming from a reporter of a few of those
> issues, I can say it is extremely offputting as it's (in PHP's case)
> almost impossible to get those tickets out of that state, even if more
> info has been supplied. Many valid bugs were shelved/forgotten for
> lack of interest.

I don't see this being an issue in Django. If you provide more info,
then you can change the state to "reopened" and someone else will take
a look at it, just as they would with any other ticket.

>
> Trac also doesn't seem to search "closed" tickets, so you may have an
> increase in duplicate bugs being reported.

Do you mean this search:
http://code.djangoproject.com/search?q=something ? It finds closed
tickets to me.

-- 
Łukasz Rekucki

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to