2011/5/27 Gábor Farkas <ga...@nekomancer.net>:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Sean O'Connor <s...@seanoc.com> wrote:
>> A better approach would for Django to provide some tools and documentation
>> to help people work around the conflict. One easy solution would be to
>> provide a verbatim tag like what ericflo wrote
>> at https://gist.github.com/629508. Another would be to provide
>> documentation on tools that make it easy to load jquery style templates via
>> ajax like icanhaz.js.
>
> (technically, there is an open jquery-templating ticket about making
> the template-tag format customizable:
> https://github.com/jquery/jquery-tmpl/issues/74)
>
> i had the same problem in the past (btw. mustache.js also uses the
> two-curly-braces notation :-),
> and unfortunately the verbatim tag did not solve the problem, because
> sometimes you need
> to use the django-templating INSIDE the jquery template
> .
> for example:
> """
> .
> .
> <script type="text/x-jquery-tmpl">
> Are you sure to delete {{ name_of_thing }}?
> <button>{% trans "YES"%}</button>
> <button>{% trans "NO"%}</button>
> </script>
> """
>
> here i want the {{ name_of_thing }} to be handled by
> jquery-templating, but the translation
> should happen using the django-tags.
>
> so either i have to use the {% verbatim %} tag only around the places
> where i have javascript-variables
> (and not around the whole jquery-template), or i have to do the
> translation in python,
> and send them in as variables in javascript. both seem to be impractical.
>
> the approach i chose was to use a different variable-syntax
> (instead of "{{ thing }}", i use "[[ thing ]]"), and before using the
> template,
> i simply replace those with the correct values. it's not nice, but
> still the most practical solution i could find.
>
> gabor
I wonder if verbatim as a filter makes more sense, for example::
<script type="text/x-jquery-tmpl">
Are you sure to delete {{ "{{ name_of_thing }}"|verbatim }}?
<button>{% trans "YES"%}</button>
<button>{% trans "NO"%}</button>
</script>
The filter would then just return {{ name_of_thing }} back to the
template. If you wanted to use a template variable as the name of the
jQuery variable this approach would still fail.
Now that I think about it maybe the replace tokens approach is the
most flexible.
{% verbatim "[[" "]]" %}
<script type="text/x-jquery-tmpl">
Are you sure to delete [[ name_of_thing ]]?
<button>{% trans "YES"%}</button>
<button>{% trans "NO"%}</button>
</script>
{% endverbatim %}
You you could then choose the tokens that get replaced.
- Sean
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Django developers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
