On 21.09.2011, at 11:14, Tom Christie wrote:

> Heya,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback.  I quite like the explicit 'STATIC_URL' only 
> approach, although I think a lot of users would still run into a problem 
> there, because 'request' isn't also added in explicitly to the Context...
> 
>   For context, my particular use case is a simple '500.html' template, that 
> extends a 'base.html' template.  I don't use any other context in the base 
> template other than 'request' and 'STATIC_URL'.  In the case of a 500 error, 
> I'd see the template render correctly, except that it'd look like the user 
> isn't logged in.  Coming across that as a dev that'd confuse the hell out of 
> me the first time I came across it unless I already understood the 500 
> Context behavior, and it's not ideal from the end-user perspective either.
> 
>   I'd imagine that plenty of other setups would have a similar setup, so you 
> could argue that returning this:
> 
> Context({'STATIC_URL': settings.STATIC_URL, 'request': request})
> 
> would be an okay thing to do in the default 500 handler.

Passing STATIC_URL to the 500.html template is not needed anymore
now that we've added a new {% static %} template tag:

  https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.4/#static-template-tag

I strongly believe this ticket shouldn't be reopened because of that.

Jannis

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.

Reply via email to