On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Jordan Hagan <[email protected]> wrote:
> As it seems that there is no longer any real opposition to this ticket (if > there is, now would be the time to speak up) I'll go ahead and prepare a > patch against the current trunk and get it uploaded to trac and see where > we get to from there. > > Hopefully I'll get a chance to take a look at this this week, I'll post a > link to the trac ticket here once I've opened it. > It's a bit presumptuous to say there's "no longer any real opposition" when the people who raised the original opposition haven't said anything. I haven't seen anything that addresses my original concerns -- that this is a niche requirement that complicates the default case, and can be achieved in end-user code for that small subset of people that are affected. The internal mechanics of CBVs are already complex. I'm afraid I still don't see the general-purpose value in what is being proposed here. Yours, Russ Magee %-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en.
