+1
On 7 August 2013 08:16, Anssi Kääriäinen <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to documenting it. > > > On Wednesday, August 7, 2013 12:28:59 AM UTC+3, Daniele Procida wrote: >> >> Is there any reason why django.utils.functional.**cached_property should >> not be documented, so that it can easily be used? >> >> <https://code.djangoproject.**com/ticket/20870<https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20870>> >> >> >> I'd have a lot of use for it. >> >> Daniele >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
