On Wed, Aug 7, 2013, Aymeric Augustin <[email protected]> wrote:
>2013/8/6 Daniele Procida <[email protected]> > >> Is there any reason why django.utils.functional.cached_property should not >> be documented, so that it can easily be used? >> >> <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/20870> >> > >Yes, it's stable enough. > >The main drawback of the current implementation is that it's impossible to >clear the cached value. That should be mentioned in the docs. *Where* would be a good place to mention this? There doesn't seem to be a single place in the documents for "handy decorators you might like". Perhaps there should be, with links to <https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/http/decorators/> for example. There's <https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.5/ref/utils/#module-django.utils.functional> of course, but no-one would actually find it there unless they were already looking for it. Daniele -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
