Hi Russ, On Saturday, November 9, 2013 11:34:53 PM UTC+1, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > I'm a little concerned about this talk about deprecation here -- the > app_name exists for a reason, and at time the app_name feature was added, > it worked (to the best of my knowledge, anyway). >
It most likely did, till we switched the admin to not use hardcoded URLs: https://github.com/django/django/commit/aaf77c1676e44019abe544911ff7a06eb2690295 -- I have to say that I completely missed app_name there since the tests didn't seem to cover it and URL namespaces had been kind of a blackbox to me. That said; we changed this two years ago, so my question is: is this a feature we want to have? Also I'd appreciate if you can come up with a few ideas of how to fix it and probably explain the rationale for adding it in the first place so I can understand how this was ment to be used. Cheers, Florian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/00ce339f-ecb1-4c21-b354-fd133bd2274c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
