On Friday, March 14, 2014 4:50:49 PM UTC+1, Michael Manfre wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] < > [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: >> >> >>> .get(or=None) (of some description) would be my preference, but even >>> that is ugly and confuses the existing API with "special" keywords that >>> aren't actually a filter. >>> >> >> I would be strong -1 on having a special keyword. >> > > Even if the special keyword is 'default'? .get(..., default=None) is a > common python pattern that fits well with this usage. >
Yes, especially 'default' -- which is a perfectly valid name for a table column. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/4aa7d1e3-4fb3-429e-a95a-6e52cc9b511a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
