Hi there, I'm Yamila, part of Taiga Team and Kaleidos (the company that develops Taiga.io). We're very happy to be as a "completely hypothetical" candidate for a new bugtracker. Taiga (a Django and open source project) being used by django-dev would be huge :)
I just wanted to let you know that me or anyone in our team would be glad to answer any question about the product, saas or installation, migrating issues or anything related. No strings attached, of course!!! Best, Yamila On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 12:55:26 AM UTC+1, Tim Graham wrote: > > To search Trac, use "site:code.djangoproject.com your query" in a Google > search box. Works great in my experience. > > On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 6:42:44 PM UTC-5, Josh Smeaton wrote: >> >> FWIW I actually like Jira (much more than Trac) and find it a lot easier >> to use. I think the trick is configuring very basic workflows so users >> don't have to fight through transitions. Open, Closed, Assigned/In Progress >> and transitions to and from each state would get us really close to the >> current Trac workflow. My number 1 gripe with Trac is that search SUCKS, so >> I'd actually be in favour of a migration *if someone else were to do all >> the work* :D. But that's the rub isn't it, nothing comes for free. We'd >> also lose login with Github (I think) and psuedo-anonymous triage because >> Jira requires an email account, so there's no way it could be a full parity >> transition. >> >> Taiga looks very nice, but arguments made above also apply. There's a >> cost in setup + migration, overhead of learning a new system, and a lack of >> knowledge about the problems that will evidently exist. >> >> I really do think Trac is awful though, just wanted to be clear about >> that. >> >> On Thursday, 7 January 2016 03:34:13 UTC+11, Victor Sosa wrote: >>> >>> >>> Looks like it is a NO to the proposition. >>> >>> Daniele >>> >>> I like what I saw in taiga, that's a way better bug tracking UI; you can >>> check here: >>> >>> https://tree.taiga.io/project/taiga/issues?page=1 >>> >>> On Wednesday, January 6, 2016 at 12:18:13 PM UTC-4, Daniele Procida >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016, Daniele Procida <dan...@vurt.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >By all means it's useful to get votes on something like this, even >>>> >before we consider those questions, because if enough people want >>>> >something it's always possible - but be aware that simply getting lots >>>> >of votes for it would only ever be the first and easiest step. >>>> >>>> While we're in the realm of the completely hypothetical, if I were >>>> going to find myself enthusiastic about moving to a new development >>>> tracking platform, it would be Taiga. <https://taiga.io> >>>> >>>> It's written in Django, by a company that actively supports the Django >>>> community. It's open-source. The people who develop it are approachable >>>> and friendly. It has a nice name. >>>> >>>> Daniele >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/b4b8d31a-605f-4ae8-b8d7-372965de4f69%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
