On 09/01/16 13:08, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
Not an actual django developer (I'm a user lurking here really), but I'd still like to chime in:
Doesn't make your input any less valid... in fact, perhaps makes it more valuable :)
* Jira is too complex. Devs may end up understanding it, but users will have a harder time, especially since they won't be using it as much.
I agree here... having used it in projects in the past, I've found is bizarrely slow, and tedious.
* Moving from a FLOSS tool to a proprietary solution really gives mixed signals. It'd confuse me why a team who clearly appreciates open-sourceness would make such a move with so many great alternatives out there.
Absolutely agree here... but, could you mention some of these "great alternatives"? Several others have espoused their position that "they all suck" [and I don't believe they're limiting that to just OSS ones :)]
I certainly believe it would be a coup if we could wind up with a Django based one... for obvious reasons.
-- Curtis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/569094D3.3020400%40tinbrain.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
