Hi Mark. What I'm not sure about here is how things have changed from Carl's original observation in the comment you link.
On Thursday, 6 September 2018 13:53:05 UTC+2, Mark Gensler wrote: > > https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/16995#comment:1 > > ... if it's an improvement at all, it's not enough of one to justify making a backwards-incompatible change. As such I'm initially sceptical. I think I'm not really seeing your use-case, so perhaps if you motivated that some... What you do say is this: > ...the length of the initial data may not be known at the time of class construction. OK. But there's nothing to stop you defining a base FormSet class which has all the knowns and then using `modelformset_factory()` to pass in the known-at-runtime `extra` value that you need. https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.1/ref/forms/models/#modelformset-factory Another way of saying "perhaps if you motivated that some..." is, Why isn't that good enough? Kind Regards, Carlton -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/django-developers. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/76a7d8ec-2d3a-4075-a210-ba200ef46013%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
