Dear all,

This is probably a feature that has been proposed before, but I could not find a discussion on it, so I proposed it on the tracker, and Tim also couldn't find a discussion.

(ticket: )

I would like to propose being able to write `SomeModel.objects.exists(field=value)` over `SomeModel.objects.filter(field=value).exists()` (and similar for `.count(**kwargs)`.

As Tim rightfully commented: "There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.".

I'm proposing this is a case where the obvious way would eventually be more in line with my suggestion instead of what we currently use.

Consider the following code example (from


There is a weird (to me, your mileage might vary) ").exists()" as a final line, and I would like to write this as


This pattern seems to be quite rare in the Django codebase itself, but in the codebase at work we have several cases of `queryset.filter(<lots of lines>).exists()` (and similar with count), and I am expecting this to also be prevalent in other codebases out there.

Arguing against it however are the following lines of the Zen of Python:

- "Explicit is better than implicit."

- Maybe also "Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.", because `.filter().count()` and `.exclude().count()` are both the same pattern, but this would only create an alternative for the first.

- "There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it."

Beyond these short quips, I was hoping there might also be an earlier discussion covering this.

Kind regards,

Sjoerd Job Postmus

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django 
developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
To post to this group, send email to
Visit this group at
To view this discussion on the web visit
For more options, visit

Reply via email to