Hey Ofek. On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 17:04, Ofek Lev <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'd much rather let the bulk of smaller projects adopt, and iron out the > details, and then update when it's a better beaten track. > > Can we please quantify such heuristics? I want something concrete to write > in my OSS to-do list :) > Well, I guess A decent number™ of projects in the Django eco-system, would do. (No I'm not saying how many :) But if you were to offer updating Jazzband projects, and that all went smooth, then that would directly feed into people here knowing more about the state of play. Also, I'd be happy to look at this for the Channels Trio (Channels/Daphne/Channels Redis. I'm working on updates for all of those now. I did have Flit in mind... so my first question would be why Hatch rather than that? — But if you were prepared to discuss that I'd be appreciative of the contribution. Kind Regards, Carlton -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/CAJwKpyS252oFWvDzo3-FtR8Qk6AFuKnKD-5CaNZt3ULTdakA4g%40mail.gmail.com.
