#29688: ModelAdmin: Add attribute to override manager used by
ModelAdmin.get_queryset()
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Jon Dufresne   |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  New feature    |                   Status:  new
    Component:  contrib.admin  |                  Version:  master
     Severity:  Normal         |               Resolution:
     Keywords:                 |             Triage Stage:  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  1              |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0              |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0              |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment (by Carlton Gibson):

 I'm not sure about this.

 Slight aside, I'm not sure that ''soft-delete'' isn't an anti-pattern but,
 my understanding of this was always that **if** you do implement these
 custom managers, you also need to make sure you don't override interfere
 with exactly this kind of internal behaviour.

 From the docs:

 > If you use custom Manager objects, take note that the first Manager
 Django encounters (in the order in which they’re defined in the model) has
 a special status. Django interprets the first Manager defined in a class
 as the “default” Manager, and several parts of Django (including dumpdata)
 will use that Manager exclusively for that model. As a result, it’s a good
 idea to be careful in your choice of default manager in order to avoid a
 situation where overriding get_queryset() results in an inability to
 retrieve objects you’d like to work with.

 The examples in the docs point to this sort of thing:

 {{{
     objects = models.Manager() # The default manager.
     dahl_objects = DahlBookManager() # The Dahl-specific manager.
 }}}

 ... where we leave the built-in functionality alone and implement our base
 filtering (i.e. soft-delete here) in a separate manager.

 It seems to me that adding API to ModelAdmin (or needing to override
 `get_queryset()` to go via `_base_manager`) to allow correcting for
 **not** following the advice here is... well... not the way I'd go, shall
 we say.

 Not totally against, but that's my thought.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/29688#comment:2>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/067.e077381193bd5aa4e76a9fb07cdd924d%40djangoproject.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to