#35399: Reduce the "Case-When" sequence for a bulk_update when the values for a
certain field are the same.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
     Reporter:  Willem Van Onsem     |                    Owner:  nobody
         Type:  New feature          |                   Status:  new
    Component:  Database layer       |                  Version:  5.0
  (models, ORM)                      |
     Severity:  Normal               |               Resolution:
     Keywords:  db, bulk_update,     |             Triage Stage:
  case, when                         |  Unreviewed
    Has patch:  1                    |      Needs documentation:  0
  Needs tests:  0                    |  Patch needs improvement:  0
Easy pickings:  0                    |                    UI/UX:  0
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by Simon Charette):

 Thank you for taking the time to perform the benchmarks, I think you
 missed the point brought up about hashing being expensive on non-literal
 values though.

 In other words `int.__hash__` is pretty fast but `Expression.__hash__`
 isn't and you need to perform an implicit one to gather values in
 `defaultdict(list)`. Since `bulk_update` support both expressions and
 literal assignment the benchmark must be run against both to be
 representative.

 Try running them with assignments of `F("scans_in") +
 Value(random.randint(0, m))` instead and you should see a slowdown.

 The need for _hashability_ also poses another problem. What should be done
 with values that are not hashable such as `JSONField` assignment of
 `dict`s?

 {{{#!python
 objects = [
     Object(pk=1, data={"foo": "bar"}),
     Object(pk=2, data={"foo": "bar"}),
 ]
 Object.objects.bulk_update(es, fields=["data"])
 }}}

 When all of these edge cases are accounted for (we'll need a route for
 non-hashable values mixed with hashable values) I still believe that time
 would be better spend not using `CASE` / `WHEN` at all and favor investing
 efforts towards #29771 and #31202.
-- 
Ticket URL: <https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/35399#comment:4>
Django <https://code.djangoproject.com/>
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django updates" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-updates/0107018f1116c4d5-55edef6d-5f1e-4629-bd29-3b552eb41fe6-000000%40eu-central-1.amazonses.com.

Reply via email to