With the 2.0 beta sitting out there, I've begun thinking about how best to package libdkim for Debian. The important questions this brings up are:
1. Shared vs. static: Is there any intent to ship libdkim.so as a general-use library, or just libdkim.a? I generally prefer to build/ ship libdkim.so, but if Debian is the only thing doing so, it's probably not very useful. 2. Headers: What headers should ship with the "development" version of the package? Just dkim.h? 3. Versioning: Debian requires versioning of shared libraries (and use of SONAME). What is the appropriate version number for libdkim in the dkim-milter 1.x package? How about 2.x? Should I skip packaging the 1.x version of the library entirely? -- Mike Markley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
