Mike Markley skrev, on 19-07-2007 08:01:

>> Running rpmlint on the rpm doesn't give any indication that there should 
>> be any development package; normally rpmlint is strict about there 
>> having to be such, if it's warranted.
> 
> Per Debian policy, if I do ship a library, I need a library and a dev
> package. Since this is for upload to the Debian archive, that matters to
> me :).

Actually, I do have both 
./obj.Linux.2.6.20-1.2952.fc6.i686/libdkim/libdkim.a and 
./obj.Linux.2.6.20-1.2952.fc6.i686/libdk/libdk.a. but they're not 
packaged, do an ldd and strings|less on the milter binary.

> I'm mostly curious about the shared library issues; I know libdkim is
> intended to be useful in other applications, but I don't know if Murray
> intends to generally support it as a shared library.

There is no shared milter library in my packages ...

--Tonni

-- 
Tony Earnshaw
Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss

Reply via email to