Hi,

Murray S. Kucherawy --> dkim-milter-discuss (2007-08-08 11:52:39 -0700):
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > One problem remains though, which is the "msglen != canonlen" test. 
> > "msglen" contains the total number of body bytes seen; however, 
> > "canonlen" could be short even if "l=" is not in use because trailing 
> > CRLFs are not canonicalized.  I'll have to look into a different test 
> > for that case.
> 
> I've amended dkim_sig_getcanonlen() to return this information more 
> accurately.  The next beta will contain the fix if you want to try it out.

Your fix seems not to work; checking `signlen' after
dkim_sig_getcanonlen() returns in dkim-filter/dkim-filter.c:mlfi_eom()
I see it's always 4294967295 aka (2^32)-1, but since off_t is a signed
64 bit int (at least here on NetBSD) this is _not_ (off_t)-1, thus
tmp_lengths is still always TRUE.

IIUC that's because the `length' parameter passed to dkim_add_canon()
is zero or an off_t (unsigned) for all callers, but the function
declares it as a size_t (signed!). This should probably be an off_t
as well, or at least a ssize_t, shouldn't it?


Regards, Jukka

-- 
bashian roulette:
$ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss

Reply via email to