On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Jukka Salmi wrote: > The solution seems not to be as easy as changing that size_t to an > off_t: when doing this, dkimf_stats_record() is called correctly (with > tmp_lengths == FALSE for messages without a l= tag) as expected, but > correctly signed messages suddenly fail verification because of > DKIM_SIGBH_MISMATCH. Hmm, I don't see why ATM... Any hints?
I'm looking into this. The type change you've suggested is probably part of the solution, but there's at least one other place where the types still mismatch. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
