On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Todd Lyons wrote: > Is it safe to assume that it's complaining about the 'v=0.5' in the > signature, or is there more to it than that?
That's precisely it. The implementation doing the signing there is using the version number we had in the drafts prior to the RFC being issued. When I re-did all of the canonicalization stuff, it became far too complex to maintain support for older versions, so out it went. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
