On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Jim Fenton wrote: > Unfortunately, with signers in data centers throughout the world (this > message was signed in Amsterdam), it looks like it'll be quite a while > before Cisco is signing with v=1. It sounds like there was a > canonicalization change (which I completely forgot about) between v=0.5 > and v=1. I'll need to look that up.
There were many drafts using "v=0.5" so figuring out which one your implementation used makes it hard to determine whether there was a canonicalization change between that day and today. In any case, it's easy to make libdkim tolerate the older "v=" value. I'll see if I can work that into a 2.2.2 release. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
