On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Jim Fenton wrote: > Implementing old canonicalization schemes seems onerous, but I wonder if > it would be possible to just provide an option to be more permissive > about the version numbers. That way, if the canonicalization change > only affects some messages/canonicalizations, it might be possible to > verify some additional messages. I doubt that it would open any > significant exploits.
Try patch #1796687, now available on SourceForge. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
