On Monday 15 October 2007 14:38, Dave Isaacs wrote: > I thought of that, but discovered that all smtpd instances will need to > sign at least some of the mail passing through. For example, an e-mail > relayed from a content scanner *might* be tagged for encryption, in > which case it would be forwarded to the encryption service and then sent > on its way. Or it *might* no need to be encrypted, and would be sent on > its way immediately. > Then you probably ought to consider reworking your configuration to add a final smtpd that does all the signing. I suspect anything else is on the path to madness due to complexity and corner cases.
Scott K ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
