On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, steve ladewig wrote: > So adding additional headers should not effect the signature/body?
Generally correct. However, it's possible for a signer to craft a signature that would be invalidated by the addition of certain header fields. It's difficult to determine if that was the case here. >> If you're interested in debugging the problem, have the person who sent >> the message which failed try sending you a message directly to see if that >> works. > > I did notice that all the messages that were being rejected came from > gmail.com. I have some trouble believing that gmail has posted corrupted keys or used bogus signatures and not fixed the problem. However, I also see some failures as their mail is munged by intermediaries; since I started tracking, gmail.com has had 755 passes and 560 failures, and googlemail.com has 125 passes and 106 failures. googlegroups.com is much better, with 179 passes and only 9 failures. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
