On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Mark Martinec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Murray wrote: >> I have some trouble believing that gmail has posted corrupted keys or used >> bogus signatures and not fixed the problem. However, I also see some >> failures as their mail is munged by intermediaries; since I started >> tracking, gmail.com has had 755 passes and 560 failures, and
Mine is much worse since I subscribe to LKML, and lots of people on there use gmail. Mailman munging does invalidate the signatures for that list (and every list I subscribe to). > Here are DKIM signature statistics (just their DKIM signature, not DK) > of Google mail received during last 7 days at our site, grouped by a > signing domain (d tag). Here's what I see here, though it's more than a week, more like about 3 months: # dkim-stats /var/lib/dkim/test.db | egrep 'gmail|google' google.com:1/1 52 pass/423 fail, last l=0, a=1, Sun Aug 31 10:00:31 2008 googlegroups.com:1/1 16 pass/0 fail, last l=0, a=1, Tue Aug 19 08:44:25 2008 googlemail.com:1/1 184 pass/1267 fail, last l=0, a=1, Tue Sep 2 02:35:23 2008 gmail.com:1/1 2297 pass/19616 fail, last l=0, a=1, Tue Sep 2 06:56:40 2008 As stated earlier, all the failures are either forged spam or mailing lists. -- Regards... Todd ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
