Hi SM,

SM wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
> At 12:42 27-05-2009, Ulrich Mierendorff wrote:
>> Before I try a new version: are you using a recent version and could
>> tell me how much memory it consumes?
> 
> I'm running version 2.8.2 at one site.  Memory usage is approximately 
> 26 MB.  I have a version with experimental code at another site where 
> the memory usage is 51 MB.
> 
> It would be good to get some feedback about memory usage.


Well, I have two machines running DKIM, one to sign (outgoing server) and one 
to verify 
(ingoing mail server).

The signing machine is a X86 under Solaris 10 - so lo traffic - around 2000 
messages a 
day. Top gives :

    PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATE    TIME    CPU COMMAND
  20701 root       7  59    0   26M   25M sleep   28:17  0.00% dkim-filter

The other machine is a Sparc under Solaris 10 - with a higher traffic ~ 50K 
messages 
verified a day. Top gives :

    PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE  SIZE   RES STATE    TIME    CPU COMMAND
    839 root       7  59    0   96M   95M sleep   37:19  0.02% dkim-filter

IMHO, at the same traffic level, memory usage under Linux shall be higher than 
under Solaris.

Regards

José-Marcio




-- 
  ---------------------------------------------------------------
  Jose Marcio MARTINS DA CRUZ           http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr
  Ecole des Mines de Paris
  60, bd Saint Michel                      75272 - PARIS CEDEX 06
  mailto:[email protected]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT 
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian 
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com 
_______________________________________________
dkim-milter-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss

Reply via email to