At 13:48 27-05-2009, System Support wrote: >Two 2.8.0 installations: > >57MB Virt /2.1MB Res
Thanks. At 14:03 27-05-2009, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: >Well, I have two machines running DKIM, one to sign (outgoing >server) and one to verify >(ingoing mail server). > >The signing machine is a X86 under Solaris 10 - so lo traffic - >around 2000 messages a >day. Top gives : > > PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND > 20701 root 7 59 0 26M 25M sleep 28:17 0.00% dkim-filter > >The other machine is a Sparc under Solaris 10 - with a higher >traffic ~ 50K messages >verified a day. Top gives : > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND > 839 root 7 59 0 96M 95M sleep 37:19 0.02% dkim-filter > >IMHO, at the same traffic level, memory usage under Linux shall be >higher than under Solaris. The memory usage for the verifier is quite high. I have a high traffic site where it got over 128 MB. I have not identified the cause yet. That doesn't mean that the memory usage for Jose's verifier is too high as it's a high traffic server. As Jose pointed out, the memory usage may vary depending on the operating system in use. At 14:40 27-05-2009, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >I've done some code review work on it as well and haven't managed to >discover any leaks in dkim-filter, libdkim or libar. I tried compiling it I haven't found any memory leaks either. Regards, -sm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com _______________________________________________ dkim-milter-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dkim-milter-discuss
