Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> Actually engineering intuition was all that is needed. > > That's not data, and obviously from the traffic on all the > DKIM lists lately, that intuition is not universal.
Nice Murray! You're quite a nice fella. Sure its data. It just don't appear out of thin air. I know you could care less, but we do have 25+ year mail system experience, few thousands active customer using our system, years worth of stats and field experiences, including gigabytes of Domainkeys/DKIM collection. It wasn't hard to predict all the problems existing with DKIM and the information out there isn't showing anything different. It wasn't like I was proven wrong with all the issues that has developed. Gee, not even many promoters of DKIM don't sign mail, including us - I wonder why. :) I know you are on a stats track and I'm sure it will interesting, but I don't see what its going to show beyond what was already know. Anyway, this went off course. -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ dkim-ops mailing list [email protected] http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops
